nullnull
nullnullnullnull nullnullnullnull nullnullnullnull nullnullnullnull nullnullnullnull nullnullnullnull nullnullnullnull nullnullnullnull nullnullnullnullCATEGORÍA: Accidentes de tráfico
nullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnull nullnullnullnullnullnullnullnull
A muchos empleados les resulta difícil establecer límites entre su vida profesional y personal. La cosa puede complicarse aún más cuando los trabajadores utilizan sus vehículos personales para actividades relacionadas con el trabajo.
Si tienes un accidente mientras conduces tu vehículo personal por trabajo, te vendrán a la cabeza algunas preguntas inmediatas, como quién pagará los daños y las reparaciones del vehículo. La respuesta a esas preguntas depende de varios factores. Nuestro equipo de abogados de accidentes de coche en Chicago responde a algunas de esas preguntas a continuación.
Con más conductores en la carretera, los accidentes relacionados con el trabajo son alarmantemente comunes. Según la Red de Empleadores para la Seguridad Vial, en 2018 se produjeron más de 1.800 muertes y 379.000 lesiones en vehículos de motor relacionadas con el trabajo. El mismo informe estima que los accidentes relacionados con el trabajo cuestan a los empleadores más de 72 mil millones de dólares en beneficios de salud, pagos de seguros y otros daños.
Your employer may be responsible for some damages in a work-related accident. It ultimately comes down to vicarious liability: in short, your employer is liable if you are an employee working or otherwise serving your employer at the time of the crash.
For this reason, most employers carry liability insurance for injuries an employee could cause to other people in a car accident, often as part of a hired and non-owned auto policy. Property damage to your own personal vehicle, however, is usually not covered by the employer, and you may have to use your own collision coverage to repair your car.
En la mayoría de los casos, su empleador sólo puede ser responsable si se le considera un empleado, no un contratista independiente. Si eres un empleado, lo más probable es que tu empleador sea responsable subsidiario de cualquier acto negligente en el que estés implicado mientras trabajas.
Si eres un contratista independiente, la responsabilidad se complica, sobre todo si utilizas tu vehículo personal para trabajar. En muchos casos y estados, serías personalmente responsable del accidente y deberías presentar una reclamación a tu compañía de seguros.
Illinois law adds wrinkles that often decide whose insurance actually pays and whether your employer can be held responsible at all. The most common disputes turn on three issues: which auto policy responds first, whether you were inside or outside the scope of employment when the crash happened, and how your share of fault is treated under Illinois comparative negligence.
If you were on a clear work task when the crash happened, the employer’s commercial auto policy or its hired and non-owned auto liability coverage typically responds first for bodily injury you cause to other people. Your personal auto policy then sits in excess of that coverage if the employer’s limits are not enough to cover the damages.
If the crash happened on a personal trip, the order flips. Your personal auto policy pays first, and the employer’s coverage usually does not apply at all. The boundary between the two scenarios is where most disputes start and where insurers fight hardest. Do not give a recorded statement to either insurer before you talk to a lawyer about how to handle car accident insurance claims in Illinois.
Illinois courts apply the longstanding detour and frolic doctrine to decide whether an employee was acting within the scope of employment when a crash occurred. A detour is a minor deviation from a work task, such as a quick coffee stop on the way to a client meeting. Courts generally treat detours as still within the scope of employment, which means the employer can be vicariously liable for the crash.
A frolic is a substantial departure from the assigned work task, like leaving an assigned route to run a personal errand or visit a friend. A frolic typically takes the employee outside the scope of employment, which means the employer is not liable for any crash that happens during the personal trip. The line between a detour and a frolic is fact-specific, and texts, GPS data, time-stamped emails, dispatch logs, and expense reports are often the evidence that decides which side of the line your trip falls on.
Illinois follows a modified comparative negligence rule with a 51% bar. If you are found 50% or less at fault, your recovery is reduced by your share of fault. If you are found 51% or more at fault, you recover nothing.
When you were driving for work, the employer and its insurer often push fault onto you to keep their carrier off the hook. They may also argue you were on a personal frolic when the crash happened, even if the trip started as a work assignment. Both arguments can shrink or wipe out your recovery, which is why early evidence preservation, dispatch records, GPS pings, your work calendar, and expense reports, matters so much.
Si eres culpable de un accidente mientras utilizas tu vehículo personal para trabajar, podrías perder tu trabajo, ver incrementadas las primas del seguro o incluso enfrentarte a una demanda por parte de cualquier persona herida en el accidente. Su empresa podría ser considerada responsable de las lesiones que usted cause. Aun así, es posible que tengas que presentar una reclamación a tu seguro personal para obtener una indemnización por daños materiales, como las reparaciones del vehículo.
Si no eres culpable del accidente, no afectará ni a tu seguro ni al de tu empresa.
Tu empresario sólo puede ser responsable de tu accidente si puedes demostrar que estabas en el trabajo cuando ocurrió. Tendrás que demostrar lo siguiente:
Por lo general, el tiempo que pasas en el trayecto entre el trabajo y tu casa se considera tiempo personal, y tu empresa no es responsable de los accidentes que se produzcan en ese tiempo. Su empresario puede no ser responsable si usted sale de la oficina para hacer recados personales. Sin embargo, salir de su lugar de trabajo para ir a otro centro de trabajo podría considerarse una tarea relacionada con el trabajo.
Las empresas de transporte compartido y de reparto aseguran a sus conductores, pero puede que la cobertura sólo se aplique durante determinados periodos, como cuando un conductor está dando un paseo o de camino para recoger a un pasajero o hacer una entrega.
Sin embargo, la responsabilidad por accidentes de Uber y Lyft, así como por accidentes de reparto, se complica aún más porque muchas empresas clasifican a sus trabajadores como contratistas independientes y no como empleados. Esto deja a los trabajadores personalmente responsables del accidente en muchos casos.
If you were on a clear work task when the crash happened, your employer’s auto liability policy (often hired and non-owned auto coverage) usually responds first for injuries to other people, and your personal auto policy sits in excess. If you were on a personal trip, the order flips: your personal policy pays first and the employer’s coverage typically does not apply.
It is the rule Illinois courts use to decide whether you were acting within the scope of employment at the time of a crash. A small deviation from your assigned route, like grabbing coffee on the way to a meeting, is usually a detour and still within scope. A substantial personal departure, like leaving the route to run a personal errand, is a frolic and typically puts you outside the scope of employment.
Yes. Employers and their insurers regularly argue the employee was on a personal frolic to avoid vicarious liability. Dispatch records, GPS data, work calendars, texts, and expense reports often determine the outcome. Preserve that evidence early, and do not give a recorded statement to the employer’s insurer before you speak with a Chicago car accident lawyer.
Yes. Illinois uses a modified comparative negligence rule with a 51% bar. If you are 50% or less at fault, your recovery is reduced by your share of fault. If you are 51% or more at fault, you recover nothing. When an employer argues you were off-duty, that dispute often gets tangled with the comparative-fault dispute, which can significantly reduce the value of your claim.
Navegar el desafío de la responsabilidad en un caso de accidente de coche puede ser desafiante. Póngase en contacto con un abogado con experiencia en lesiones personales en Staver Accident Injury Lawyers si usted estuvo en un accidente mientras usaba su vehículo personal para trabajar.
An experienced attorney can evaluate the circumstances, discuss your options, and advise you about what to do next. We guarantee your satisfaction, no win, no fee. Reach out online or call 312-236-2900.
nullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnull nullnullnullnullnullnull